Abstract

The primary objective of this study is to investigate the effect of internal controls on the financial performance of Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) in Buea Municipality, Cameroon. Specifically, the research examines the impacts of the control environment, risk assessment, control activities, and information communication on the financial outcomes of MFIs. Utilizing a quantitative approach, data were collected from a sample of 25 MFIs and analysed using descriptive and inferential statistical methods. The findings reveal that the control environment significantly positively affects financial performance, with a correlation coefficient of 0.65 (p < 0.01), indicating that a strong ethical culture and governance structure enhance profitability.

Risk assessment was also found to positively impact financial performance, with a correlation of 0.58 (p < 0.05), suggesting that effective risk identification and mitigation strategies lead to improved operational outcomes. Control activities demonstrated a significant negative correlation of -0.45 (p < 0.05) with financial performance, implying that inadequate control measures can hinder financial results. Information communication showed a positive but non-significant correlation of 0.30 (p > 0.05), indicating potential areas for improvement.

Overall, the study emphasizes the necessity for MFIs to adopt comprehensive internal control frameworks, including the implementation of the COSO model, to enhance financial stability and operational efficiency. The results underline the critical role of effective internal controls in fostering the resilience and sustainability of MFIs in the region.

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of the Study

In the aftermath of high-profile scandals involving companies like Enron and WorldCom, internal control (IC) has emerged as a crucial mechanism for safeguarding organizations against failure (Rae & Subramaniam, 2008; Hussaini & Muhammed, 2018). IC is recognized globally as essential for enhancing performance and protecting assets while preventing errors and fraud (IFAC, 2020). Defined as a continuous process initiated by key leadership, IC aims to provide reasonable assurance in achieving organizational objectives (COSO, 1992). These objectives encompass performance effectiveness, asset protection, and compliance with laws. A strong IC framework is vital for promoting good governance and effective monitoring throughout an organization (Shaiti et al., 2013; Turnbull, 1999).

Internal control systems comprise protocols designed to protect assets and reduce fraud risk, ultimately enhancing operational efficiency (Adams, 2012). Organizations, whether for-profit or non-profit, strive to achieve their objectives, particularly in the complex landscape of non-profits where direct supervision can be challenging (Frost, 2011). Consequently, management implements internal control measures to mitigate the risk of fraud, as the absence of such controls has led organizations to suffer significant losses (Gendron & Cooper, 2013). Tools for monitoring, including segregation of duties and performance verification, are crucial for effective management and operational integrity (Magala, 2012; Morgan, 2013).

Failures in internal control systems have led to major accounting scandals, with Enron serving as a notable example (Spillane, 2014). Before its collapse in 2001, Enron’s reported profits were significantly inflated due to fraudulent practices. This collapse resulted in massive financial losses for investors and employees and highlighted the critical need for effective internal controls. Holtfreter (2010) identified various global fraud cases, emphasizing that despite existing audits, many companies managed to commit fraud without detection, underscoring the ineffectiveness of current internal control systems (Widener, 2013).

Many developing nations struggle with ineffective governmental internal control systems, which facilitate public fund misappropriation and corruption (Van Horne, 2012). For instance, Zambia has faced challenges such as capacity constraints and inadequate information processing, leading to non-compliance with internal controls. A well-functioning Internal Control System (ICS) relies on five key components: control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information communication, and monitoring (COSO, 2013). Each component plays a significant role in ensuring the overall effectiveness of the internal control framework (Okonkwo & Linda, 2016).

The control environment reflects the integrity and ethical values of an organization and is influenced by top management’s governance oversight (Akwaa-Sekyi & Rene, 2016; PWC, 2012). Risk assessment entails identifying potential errors and implementing controls to mitigate them (Gamage, Lock, & Fernando, 2014). Control activities include measures to establish acceptable risk levels and safeguard assets, while effective communication ensures timely and accurate data exchange within the organization (Mathew, 2011; Abiola & Oyewole, 2013).

Monitoring is essential for evaluating the performance of the ICS and ensuring quality control (Etengu & Amony, 2016). COSO (2013) recommends a combination of continuous and periodic assessments to evaluate ICS effectiveness. The role of internal and external audits is critical in this context, especially in the banking sector, where ICS requirements are vital for maintaining financial stability (Kumuthinidevi, 2016). Organizations must engage in regular evaluations of their internal controls to identify and rectify weaknesses (Hayali et al., 2013).

Financial performance is assessed through various financial statements and metrics, including revenue, profitability, and cash flow (Jenning et al., 2008). Internal control systems are designed to enhance the reliability of financial performance, fostering accountability among information providers (Donald & Delno, 2009). As noted by Ondieki (2013), effective control measures can prevent fraud, thereby supporting organizational profitability and resource management.

Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) provide essential financial services to low-income populations, contributing to economic development (Christen et al., 2003). The origins of microfinance date back to the 18th century, evolving into a structured approach in countries like Cameroon, where MFIs have proliferated since the late 1980s (Armendáriz et al., 2010; Long, 2009). Today, Cameroon boasts the highest number of registered MFIs in the CEMAC region, holding significant shares of total deposits and loan portfolios (Coulter & Abena, 2010).

1.2 Statement of the Problem

Microfinance institutions (MFIs) in Buea, Cameroon, play a crucial role in promoting financial inclusion and supporting the economic development of underserved populations. However, many of these institutions face significant challenges related to their internal control systems, which directly impact their financial performance.

The financial performance of microfinance institutions (MFIs) is critically linked to the effectiveness of their internal control systems. In many cases, inadequate internal controls lead to poor liquidity management, reduced profitability, operational inefficiencies, and compliance failures. Liquidity issues arise when MFIs cannot efficiently manage their cash flows, hindering their ability to meet short-term obligations and thus affecting their sustainability (Bourne & Neely, 2003).

Furthermore, profitability is directly impacted by financial mismanagement and fraud, as weak internal controls create opportunities for resource misallocation and financial losses (Beasley, Branson, & Hancock, 2009). Operational efficiency suffers as well, with delays in loan processing and a lack of proper oversight leading to increased operational costs and diminished customer satisfaction. Additionally, compliance with regulatory requirements becomes challenging, exposing MFIs to legal penalties and reputational risks when internal controls are insufficient (Van Horne, 2012).

To address these challenges, MFIS need to enhance their internal control frameworks. One effective approach is to implement the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) framework, which offers a structured model for designing and evaluating internal controls (COSO, 2013). This framework emphasizes the importance of establishing a strong control environment, conducting thorough risk assessments, and implementing robust control activities.

Regular training for staff on the principles of internal controls and financial management can strengthen the organization’s ability to mitigate risks and improve operational performance (Ganiyu, 2018). Empowering employees with the necessary knowledge and skills will enable them to recognize and address inefficiencies proactively., information and communication, to investigate how they affect financial performance.

1.3 Research Questions

1. What is the effect of control activities on the financial performance of MFIs?
2. What is the effect of risk assessment on the financial performance of MFIs?
3. What is the effect of a controlled environment on the financial performance of MFIs?
4. What is the effect of information and communication on the financial performance of MFIs?

Check out: Accounting Project Topics with Materials